Introduction to Embracing Hope:

Every family’s journey with neurodiversity is unique, often filled with both daunting challenges and moments of profound connection. Embracing Hope: A Caregiver’s Guide to Neurodiversity is a comprehensive, compassionate resource created for caregivers navigating the...

read more

Core Conversations: The Heart of Embracing Hope

Blog - Embracing Hope: Innovative Strategies to Empower Parents Raising Neurodiverse TeensBooks & Publications Proin eget tortor risus. Cras ultricies ligula sed magna dictum porta. Vivamus suscipit tortor eget felis porttitor volutpat. Nulla porttitor Business...

read more

PDF Menu for files related to this chapter

What Is Confabulation?

Confabulation is when a person unintentionally fabricates, distorts, or misremembers information. Unlike lying, confabulation is not intentional—it happens when the brain fills in gaps in memory with incorrect or made-up details. This is common in our children, where memory, executive function, and impulse control may be impacted. Unfortunately, confabulation is often mistaken for manipulation, dishonesty, or attention-seeking behavior when it is actually a neurological issue.

Symptoms Related to Confabulation 

Eight common symptoms of confabulation that are often mistaken as behaviors in our neurodiverse children. What looks like lying or exaggeration is often a result of memory gaps being filled with emotions, and false or imagined details. Understanding that these are symptoms can help us as parents provide better support.

Telling Exaggerated Stories 

Your child may share stories that seem far-fetched or inaccurate, not because they intend to lie, but because their brain fills in memory gaps with imagined details. Research shows this is particularly common in children with FASD, where up to 73% experience regular confabulation. (The percentages are also high for the other profiles we are covering.)

Inconsistent Story Details 

Your teen may retell the same experience with different details each time. While this might appear like deception, studies show it’s their brain attempting to make sense of fragmented memories. Each retelling reconstructs the memory anew, pulling from various sources to create what feels like a complete narrative.

Reality-Imagination Blending

Our children often struggle to separate actual memories from imagined ones, leading to confusion when questioned. This isn’t deliberate—their brains process and store information differently, making it challenging for them to distinguish between real experiences and things they’ve seen, heard, or imagined (Like in the story of Kennedy).

Source-Monitoring Errors

Our children often recall events accurately but struggle to remember where the memory came from. They might genuinely believe something happened to them when it was actually from a movie, a conversation, or a past dream. This isn’t dishonesty—it’s a neurological difficulty in tracking the source of their memories, making it hard for them to distinguish personal experiences from things they’ve merely heard or seen. 

Below is a chart for the differences between reality-imagination and source monitoring.

Source-Monitoring Error vs Reality–Imagination Blending

Feature Source-Monitoring Error Reality–Imagination Blending
Cause Failure to recall where a memory came from Fusion of imagined and real events
Memory Type Real memory, misattributed source False memory that feels real
Awareness May correct the error when given evidence Firmly believes the blended memory
Example Confusing a dream with a real event Truly believing in an event that never happened

Combining Separate Events 

They may merge elements of different experiences into one coherent story. Research indicates this memory blending occurs more frequently in children with multiple neurodevelopmental profiles. For example, they might combine details from a school field trip with a family vacation, creating a new “memory” that feels entirely real to them.

Believing False Memories 

Even when stories seem implausible, our kids genuinely believe their confabulated memories are real. Studies show this conviction stems from how their brains process and store information. The emotional connection to these memories is authentic, even if the details aren’t accurate.

Overconfidence in Details 

Your child might appear unusually confident when recounting incorrect details. Unlike lying, where there’s typically hesitation or guilt, confabulation comes with complete conviction because these memories feel absolutely real.

Defensive During Questions 

When asked for clarification, our children may become frustrated or defensive. Research shows that this reaction stems from genuine distress when their reality is questioned. They’re not being obstinate; they’re experiencing real confusion when their memories don’t match reality.

The chart below provides a few examples of Lying versus Confabulation.

Lying vs Confabulation Scenarios

Scenario Lying Confabulation
Child breaks a vase "I didn’t break it. The cat did!" (knows the truth but intentionally deceives) "I don’t know what happened, but I think my friend knocked it over when they were here." (genuinely believes a false memory)
Student forgets homework "I finished it, but I left it at home." (knows they didn’t do it but wants to avoid consequences) "I remember turning it in yesterday." (truly believes they submitted it, but their memory is incorrect)
Person with memory loss recalls an event "I was at the meeting all day." (knows they weren’t but wants to avoid admitting they forgot) "Oh yes, I remember talking to you at the meeting!" (falsely remembers attending when they didn’t)
Someone asked about their past job "I was a manager at my last job." (knows they were not, but wants to impress) "I think I was a manager at some point." (misremembers their role, believing it to be true)
Explaining how an object was lost "Someone must have stolen my phone!" (knows they left it at home but wants to shift blame) "I remember putting it in my bag at the store." (believes they did, but they actually left it at home)